|  e-ISSN: 2618-589X

Original article | TAY Journal 2023, Vol. 7(1) 265-284

“Plickers”, The Fun State of Assessment and Evaluation: The Experiences of Social Studies Pre-Service Teachers

Galip Öner

pp. 265 - 284   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.537.12   |  Manu. Number: tay journal.2023.012

Published online: March 31, 2023  |   Number of Views: 22  |  Number of Download: 512


In COVID-19 pandemic process, teachers paid effort to use Web 2.0 tools to make their classes interactive and more interesting in distance education. Central institutions have also planned and implemented various in-service trainings to support usage of technology by teachers. In the 2021-2022 academic year, distance education was terminated and face-to-face education was readopted. It can be argued that it is not acceptable to return to learning-teaching process in the classrooms without technology after two years of technology-based progress experienced with all the stakeholders of education. For this reason, it is important to make effective use of various web 2.0 tools in face-to-face education in order for students to experience and internalize technology as a teaching tool. In this context, the aim of this study is to reveal the opinions of social studies pre-service teachers as regards the Plickers application that they experienced with secondary school students. Document analysis was used in the study. In this context, the reflective texts were used as a data source where 24 pre- service teachers shared their application experiences in the portfolios they prepared in the Information Technologies in Social Studies course. The obtained data were analyzed by document analysis consisting of review, detailed examination and interpretation steps. As a result of the study, it was determined that the preparation and application processes of Plickers were experienced as “easy” and that its advantages outnumber disadvantages.

Keywords: Social studies, plickers, web 2.0, assessment and evaluation, pre-service teachers

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Oner, G. (2023). “Plickers”, The Fun State of Assessment and Evaluation: The Experiences of Social Studies Pre-Service Teachers . TAY Journal, 7(1), 265-284. doi: 10.29329/tayjournal.2023.537.12

Oner, G. (2023). “Plickers”, The Fun State of Assessment and Evaluation: The Experiences of Social Studies Pre-Service Teachers . TAY Journal, 7(1), pp. 265-284.

Chicago 16th edition
Oner, Galip (2023). "“Plickers”, The Fun State of Assessment and Evaluation: The Experiences of Social Studies Pre-Service Teachers ". TAY Journal 7 (1):265-284. doi:10.29329/tayjournal.2023.537.12.


    Aldır, Z. (2014). The examination of teacher candi̇date's thoughts in term of various factors abouth use of Web 2.0 tools in trai̇ni̇ng [Unpublished master thesis]. Sakarya University.

    Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=

    Arzfi, B. P., Yulianti, N., Desyandri & Irdamurni (2022).  The effect of the Plickers application on fifth-grade students’ learning motivation in learning ıntegrated themes. Jurnal Basıcedu, 6(4), 7154 – 7160.

    Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2022). Qualitative research in education: an introduction to theory and methods. S. Balcı & B. Ahi (Transl.). Ankara: Pegem.

    Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

    Chen, C. C., Harris, A. L. & Shang, R. A. (2009). Challenges in delivering case-based teaching in the online asynchronous learning environment. In M. R. Syed (Ed.), Strategic applications of distance learning Technologies (pp. 30-48). Information Science Reference.

    Chou, P. N. (2022). Using plickers to support student learning in rural schools: a comprehensive analysis. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1-11.

    Chng, L. & Gurvitch, R. (2018). Using plickers as an assessment tool in health and physical education settings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(2), 19-25.

    Cin Şeker, Z. (2020). The effect of web 2.0 educational tools on the success of secondary school 5th grade students in affix-root teaching. Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 5(1), 95-107. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.375858

    Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.

    Keengwe, J. (2018). Handbook of research on digital content, mobile learning, and technology ıntegration models in teacher education. IGI Global.

    Kent, D. (2019). Plickers and the pedagogical practicality of fast formative assessment. Teaching English with Technology, 19(3), 90-104.

    Ketelhut, D. J. (2019). Improving science education through developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in teachers. In O. O. Adesope & A. G. Rud (Ed.), Contemporary technologies in education: maximizing student engagement, motivation, and learning (pp.17-30). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Korkmaz, Ö., Vergili, M., Çakır, R. & Uğur Erdoğmuş, F. (2019). Plickers Web 2.0 ölçme ve değerlendirme uygulamasının öğrencilerin sınav kaygıları ve başarıları üzerine etkisi. [The impact of plickers web 2.0 assessment and evaluation tool on exam anxiety and academic success of students]. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 5(2), 15-37.

    Krause, J. M., O'Neil, K. & Dauenhauer, B. (2017) Plickers: A formative assessment tool for K–12 and PETE professionals. Strategies, 30(3), 30-36, DOI: 10.1080/08924562.2017.1297751

    López García, N. J. (2016). Evaluation and ITC in primary education: using Plickers to evaluate musical skills. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 31(2), 81-90.

    Masita, M. & Fitri, N. (2020). The use of plickers for formative assessment of vocabulary mastery. Ethical Lingua, 7(2), 310-320.

    Merriam, S. B. (2015). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulamalar için bir rehber. [Qualitative research: a guide to pattern and practice]. S. Turan (Transl. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel.

    Mshayisa V. V. (2020). Students’ perceptions of Plickers and crossword puzzles in undergraduate studies. J Food Sci Educ., 19, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12179

    O’Reilly, T. (2007). What Is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65(1), 17-37.

    Sachs, J. M. (2014). Managing the challenges of technology to support learning: some lessons from experience. In M. Gosper & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Curriculum models for the 21st century: using learning technologies in higher education (pp. 407-422). Springer.

    Şenyurt, Y. S. & Şahin, Ç. (2022). Covid-19 Salgınında uzaktan eğitim sürecinde web 2.0 araçlarının kullanımı ile ilgili sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşleri. [Opinions of classroom teachers on the use of web 2.0 tools in the distance education process in the Covid-19 epidemic]. International Journal of Science and Education, 5(1), 34-49.

    Tuncer, M. & Şimşek, M. (2019). Ortaokul 5. sınıf matematik dersi bölme işlemi konusunda plickers uygulamasının matematik kaygısına ve matematik başarısına etkisi. [The effect of plickers application on anxiety and achievement in secondary school 5th mathematics lesson about division]. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 13(19), 281-310. DOI: 10.26466/opus.578149

    UNICEF. (2020). COVID-19: Are children able to continue learning during school closures?,  https://data.unicef.org/resources/remote-learning-reachability-factsheet/ date of access: 02.08.2022.

    UNICEF. (2021). Ensuring equal access to education in future crises: findings of the new remote learning readiness index. https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Ensuring-equal-access-to-education-in-future-crises_Findings-of-the-new-RLRI_Report.pdf date of access: 02.08.2022.

    UNICEF. (2022). Are children really learning?, https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UNICEF_Are-children-really-learning_Report_2022_English.pdf date of access:

    Wilson, D. W., Lin, X., Longstreet, P. & Sarker, S. (2011). Web 2.0: A definition, literature review, and directions for future research. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Detroit, Michigan August 4th-7th 2011. 1-10.

    Wood, T. A., Brown, K. & Grayson, M. (2017). Faculty and student perceptions of Plickers. 2017 ASEE Zone II Conference, American Society for Engineering Education. http://se.asee.org/proceedings/2017%20Zone%20II%20Proceedings/papers/proceedings/3/84.pdf date of access: 02.08.2022.

    Yaylak, E. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde çevrimiçi bir uygulama örneği: plickers [An example of an onlıne applıcatıon ın socıal studıes educatıon: Plıckers]. VI. International Social Studies Education Symposium (Abstract Proceedings), 04-06 May 2017, Anadolu University, Eskişehir.

    Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin.

    Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.

    YÖK. (2019). Social studies teaching undergraduate program. Higher Education Institution. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Sosyal_Bilgileri_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi09042019.pdf  date of access: 04.07.2022.

    Zengin, Y., Bars, M. & Şimşek, Ö. (2017). Matematik öğretiminin biçimlendirici değerlendirme sürecinde Kahoot! ve Plickers uygulamalarının incelenmesi. [Investigation of using Kahoot! and Plickers in formative evaluation process in mathematics teaching]. Ege Journal of Education, 18(2), 602-626.