Adediwura, A. A., Ajayi, O. S., & Ibikunle, Y. A. (2021). Students and test variables as predictors of undergraduates’ self-compassion. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 11(3), 42-48.

Alnasraween, M. S., Alsmadi, M. S., Al-zboon, H. S., & Alkurshe, T. O. (2022). The level of universities students’ test wiseness in Jordan during distance learning in light of some variables. Education Research International, 1-10.

Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). Macmillan.

Bailey, C. D., Briggs, J. W., & Irving, J. H. (2022). Test-wiseness and multiple-choice accounting questions: Implications for instructors. Issues in Accounting Education, 37(2), 1–14.

Baker, D. L., & Baker, R. L. (2022). Knowledge and wisdom: High stakes testing and learning outcomes. In Neuroethical policy design. Studies in brain and mind. (pp.101-118). Springer.

Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (ED458219). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458219

Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (Eds.). (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques (2nd ed.). CRC.

Bolt, D. M., Kim, N., Wollack, J., Pan, Y., Eckerly, C., & Sowles, J. (2020). A psychometric model for discrete-option multiple-choice items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 44(1), 33–48.

Bolt, D. M., Lee, S., Wollack, J., Eckerly, C., & Sowles, J. (2018). Application of asymmetric IRT modeling to discrete-option Multiple-Choice Test items. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-7.

Bolt, D. M., Wollack, J. A., & Suh, Y. (2012). Application of a multidimensional nested logit model to multiple-choice test items. Psychometrika, 77, 263-287.

Bowman, M. L. (1989). Testing individual differences in ancient China. American Psychologist, 44(3), 576–578.

Burt, C. (1911). Experimental tests of higher mental processes and their relation to general intelligence. Journal of Experimental Pedagogy, 1, 93–112.

Burt, C. (1972). Inheritance of general intelligence. American Psychologist, 27(3), 175–190.

Caveon. (2020). Technology and internet-based services subscriber agreement. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from https://caveon.com/caveon-privacy-policy-for-students-of-education-subscribers/

Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Cronbach, L. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). Harper & Row.

Davis, N. T. (1996). Transition from objectivism to constructivism in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 627-636.

Eckerly, C., Smith, R. W., & Sowles, J. (2017, September 7). Analysis of the discrete option multiple choice item: Examples from its certification. Conference on Test Security, Madison, WI.

Eckerly, C., Smith, R., & Sowles, J. (2018). Fairness concerns of discrete option multiple-choice items. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 23(16), 1–10.

Erdoğan, İ. (2003). Çağdaş eğitim sistemleri [Contemporary education systems] (5th. ed.). Sistem.

Fagley, N. S. (1987). Positional response bias in multiple-choice tests of learning: Its relation to test wiseness and guessing strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 95–97.

Forsblom, L., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., & Peixoto, F. (2022). Cognitive appraisals, achievement emotions, and students’ math achievement: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 346–367.

Foster, D. F., & Miller, H. L. (2009). A new format for multiple-choice testing: Discrete option multiple-choice. Results from early studies. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51, 355-369.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Funk, R., Hooper, T., Hadlock, E., Whicker, J., Estes, D., & Miller, H. L. (2010). Differential effects of the discrete-option multiple-choice format on test takers’ assessment preparation and scores. Poster presented at the Mary Lou Fulton Undergraduate Research Conference, Provo, UT.

Gibb, B. G. (1964). Testwiseness as a secondary cue response (Publication No. 6407643) [Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University]. ProQuest Thesis Center.

Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. World Book Company.

Gorney, K., & Wollack, J. A. (2022). Does item format affect test security? Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 27(15), 1-13.

Guo, H., Rios, J. A., Ling, G., Wang, Z., Gu, L., Yang, Z., & Liu, L. O. (2022). Influence of selected-response format variants on test characteristics and test-taking effort: An empirical study. ETS Research Report Series, 2022(1), 1–20.

Güler, N. (2011). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Pegem.

Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2004). Construct-irrelevant variance in high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(1), 17–27.

Holmes, P. (2002). Multiple evaluation versus multiple choice as testing paradigm [Doctoral dissertation, Twente University]. University of Twente Research Information.

Janda, L. H. (1997). Psychological testing: Theory and applications (1st ed.). Pearson.

Kingston, N. M., Tiemann, G. C., Miller, H. L., & Foster, D. (2012). An analysis of the discrete-option multiple-choice item type. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(1), 3–19.

Kumandaş, H., & Kutlu, Ö. (2010). High stakes testing: Does secondary education examination involve any risks? Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 758-764.

Lions, S., Monsalve, C., Dartnell, P., Blanco, M. P., Ortega, G., & Lemarié, J. (2022). Does the response options placement provide clues to the correct answers in multiple-choice tests? A systematic review. Applied Measurement in Education, 35(2), 133–152.

Lowell, F. (1919). A preliminary report of some group tests of general intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(7), 323–344.

Papenberg, M. (2018). On how test wiseness and acceptance reluctance influence the validity of sequential knowledge tests [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf.

Papenberg, M., Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2019). Experimental validation of sequential multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Education, 89(2), 402–421.

Papenberg, M., Willing, S., & Musch, J. (2017). Sequentially presented response options prevent the use of testwiseness cues in multiple-choice testing. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 59(2), 245-266. 

Popham, W. J. (1999). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for educational leaders (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Porteus, S. D. (1915). Mental tests for the feebleminded: A new series. Journel of Psycho-Asthenics, 19, 200-213.

Rodriguez, M. C. (2005). Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 24(2), 3–13.

Rost, D. H., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2007). Reading comprehension without reading? On the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension test items. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 305-314.

Rotthoff, T., Fahron, U., Baehring, T., & Scherbaum, W. A. (2008). The quality of CME questions as a component part of continuing medical education--an empirical study. Zeitschrift für Ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 101, 667-674.

Samuel, J., & Hinson, J. (2012, March 5). Promoting motivation through technology-based testing. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Taylor, C., & Gardner, P. L. (1999). An alternative method of answering and scoring multiple-choice tests. Research in Science Education, 29, 353–363.

Vidal Rodeiro, C., & Macinska, S. (2022). Equal opportunity or unfair advantage? The impact of test accommodations on performance in high-stakes assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(4), 462–481.

Wainer, H., Dorans, N. J., Eignor, D. R., Flaugher, R. L., Green, B. F., Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (2015). Computerized adaptive testing a primer (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Willing, S. (2013). Discrete-option multiple-choice: Evaluating the psychometric properties of a new method of knowledge assessment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf.

Willing, S., Ostapczuk, M., & Musch, J. (2015). Do sequentially presented answer options prevent the use of test wiseness cues on continuing medical education tests? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 247–263.

Woodworth, R. S. (1910). Race differences in mental traits. Science, 31(788), 171-86.

Zhai, X., Haudek, K. C., Wilson, C., & Stuhlsatz, M. (2021). A framework of construct-irrelevant variance for contextualized constructed response assessment. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-13.