Teachers’ Opinions on the Application, Methods and Techniques Used in the Process of Distance Education

Seval Naci, Cemil Öztürk

doi:https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.537.09

Original article | TAY Journal 2023, Vol. 7(1) 179-203

Teachers’ Opinions on the Application, Methods and Techniques Used in the Process of Distance Education

Seval Naci, Cemil Öztürk

pp. 179 - 203 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.537.09 | Manu. Number: tay journal.2023.009

Published online: March 31, 2023 | Number of Views: 38 | Number of Download: 877

Save PDF

Abstract

Technological developments have also been effective in the diversification of educational environments. Along with traditional face-to-face education, distance education methods have also started to become widespread with the Information Revolution. Especially during the Covid 19 epidemic, education and training continued through online platforms. Until this date, distance education applications were used in a limited number of private primary and secondary education institutions. For this reason, the number of teachers who had previous knowledge and experience in distance education practices remained extremely low. Therefore, the majority of teachers met with distance education during the pandemic process. This historical pedagogical transformation process is one of the most important breaking points in the history of Turkish and world education. In this research, it will be tried to reveal the opinions of teachers about distance education applications during the Covid 19 pandemic. For this purpose, 10 open-ended questions were asked to the teachers in the study, which was carried out with the phenomenology pattern, which is one of the qualitative research methods. In these questions, teachers were asked about the online platforms used, the educational applications preferred to make the lessons more efficient, their advantages and disadvantages, and whether they meet their learning needs. At the end of the research, most of the teachers stated that face-to-face education is more effective especially in reaching students, but these applications and platforms provide a great advantage especially in order not to interrupt education during the pandemic process.

Keywords: Covid 19, online education, distance education

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Naci, S. & Ozturk, C. (2023). Teachers’ Opinions on the Application, Methods and Techniques Used in the Process of Distance Education . TAY Journal, 7(1), 179-203. doi: 10.29329/tayjournal.2023.537.09

Harvard
Naci, S. and Ozturk, C. (2023). Teachers’ Opinions on the Application, Methods and Techniques Used in the Process of Distance Education . TAY Journal, 7(1), pp. 179-203.

Chicago 16th edition
Naci, Seval and Cemil Ozturk (2023). "Teachers’ Opinions on the Application, Methods and Techniques Used in the Process of Distance Education ". TAY Journal 7 (1):179-203. doi:10.29329/tayjournal.2023.537.09.

References

Adıgüzel, A. (2020). Salgın sürecinde uzaktan eğitim ve öğrenci başarısını değerlendirmeye ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. [Teacher's view on the period of the epidemic, distance education and student learning evaluation]. Milli Eğitim, 49(1), 253-271.

Akdemir, Ö. (2011). Yükseköğretimimizde uzaktan eğitim. [Distance education in our higher education]. Journal of Yükseköğretim ve Bilim, 1(2), 69-71.

Aktepe, V. (2005). The importance of recognizing the individual in education. Gazi University Kırşehir Faculty of Education, 6(2), 15-24.

Akyürek, M. İ. (2020). Distance education: a literature review Medeniyet. Journal of Education Research, 4(9), 1-9,

Alper, A. (2020). Pandemi sürecinde K-12 düzeyinde uzaktan eğitim: Durum çalışması. [Distance education at K-12 level during the pandemic process: Case study]. Milli Eğitim, 49(1), 45-67.

Babayiğit, Ö. & Gültekin, M. (2019). Implementation of game based teaching method in literacy Instruction. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 9(2), 450-483.

Baran, A. & Sadık, O. (2021). An examinatıon of primary school teachers’ emergency online teaching experience and perceptions during covid-19. Journal of Uludağ University Faculty of Education, 34(2), 813-854.

Başaran, M. & Kılınçarslan, R. (2021). Effectiveness of games designed with web 2.0 tools in the process of initial literacy teaching in distance education. Journal of Türkiye Eğitim, 6(1), 186-199.

Can, N. & Köroğlu, Y. (2020). Evulation of distance education escalating during Covid-19 and its investigation from the perspective of education laborers. Journal of Madde, Diyalektik ve Toplum, 3(4), 370.

Dağhan, G., Nuhoğlu Kibar, P., Menzi Çetin, N., Telli, E. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2017). 21st century learners’ and teachers’ characteristics from ict preservice teachers’ perspectives, Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 215-235.

Demir, F. & Özdaş, F. (2020). Examining teachers’ opinions related to distance education in the covid- 19 process, Milli Eğitim, 49(1), 273-292.

Erbil, D. G., Demir, E. & Erbil, B. A. (2021). Pandemi sürecinde uzaktan eğitime yönelik sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. [Examination of primary education teachers’ views on distance education during the pandemic process]. Turkish Studies-Education, 16(3), 1473-1493. https://dx.doi.org/10.47423/TurkishStudies.49745

Elcil, Ş. & Sözen Şahiner, D. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimde iletişimsel engeller. [Uzaktan eğitimde iletişimsel engeller]. Journal of Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler, 6(1), 21-33.

Fatih Projesi. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/ date of access 30.09.2022.

Gelen, İ. (2017). P21- 21st century skill frameworks in curriculum and instruction (USA Practices). Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 1(2), 15-29.

Genç, S. (2020). Examination of distance education applications according to teacher opinions. International Journal of Innovative Approaches In Education, 4(3), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiape.2020.271.3.

Günüç, S., Odabaşı, H. F. & Kuzu, A. (2013). The defining characteristics of students of the 21st century by student teachers: A twitter activity. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 9(4), 436-455.

Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilgilerde araştırma yöntemleri felsefe-yöntem-analiz. [Research Methods in Social Studies Philosophy-Method-Analysis]. Seçkin.

Haar, M. (2018). Increasing sense of community in higher education nutrition courses using technology. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50(1), 96-99.

Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.

Kara, N., & Sevim, N. (2013). Adaptive learning systems: beyond teaching machines. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 108-120.

Kaya, Z. (2006). Öğretimde iletişim, etkileşim, yöntem, teknik, teknoloji ve materyaller. [Communication, interaction, method, technique, technology and materials in teaching]. In Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. Ankara: PegemA.

Kör, H., Çataloğlu, E. & Erbay, H. (2013), Investigation of the effects of distance education and formal education into student success. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2), 267-279.

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2022). Eba, canlı ders, ebatv, akademik destek, mesleki gelişim, eğitim bilişim ağı. [Eba, live lessons, sizev, academic support, professional development, educational information network]. Retrieved from from https://www.eba.gov.tr/ date of Access 30.09.2022.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. CA: Sage.

Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A system view of online learning (Third Edition). Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. CA: Sage.

Özdemir Baki, G. & Çelik, E. (2021). Secondary mathematics teachers’ mathematics teaching experiences in distance education. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 293-320.

Özgöl, M., Sarıkaya, İ. & Öztürk, M. (2017). Students’ and teaching staff’s assessments regarding distance education applications in formal education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(2), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2017.208.

Özkul, A. E. & Girginer, N. (2014). Uzaktan eğitimde teknoloji ve etkinlik. [Technology and effectiveness in distance education]. Journal of Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 0(3), 107-117. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sakaefd/issue/11224/134156.

Sayan, H. (2020). Assessment of faculty members’ views on distance education during the covid-19 pandemic process. AJIT-e: Journal ofBilişim Teknolojileri Online, 11(42), 100-122.

Şahin, Y., L, Karadağ, N., Bozkurt, A., Doğan, E., Kılınç, H., Uğur, S., Gümüş, S, Öztürk, A. & Güler, C. (2017). Uzaktan eğitimde oyunlaştırma kullanımı: Oyunlaştırılmış web tabanlı bir araştırma uygulaması. [The use of gamification in distance education: A gamified web-based research application.]. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 8(4), 372-395. http://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.329742.

Uyar, E. (2020). Social studies teachers’ views on distance education in the process of the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Kapadokya Education, 1(2), 15-32.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. AnkaraSeçkin.

Yıldız, E. (2020). Investigation of factors affecting the sense of community of distance education learners in online learning environments. ENAD- Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 180-205.

Yılmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self- efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(October), 373-382.

Yurtbakan, E. & Akyıldız, S. (2020). Primary school teachers, primary school students and parents' views on distance education activities implemented during the covid-19 isolation period. Turkish Studies, 15(6), 949-977. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.43780.

Volume 7 Issue 1

March 2023

All Articles