|  e-ISSN: 2618-589X

Original article | TAY Journal 2023, Vol. 7(2) 407-442

Content Analysis of Postgraduate Theses on Formative Assessment and Education in Turkey

Burcu Torun, Murat Pektaş

pp. 407 - 442   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.543.04   |  Manu. Number: tay journal.2023.019

Published online: May 08, 2023  |   Number of Views: 6  |  Number of Download: 94


Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the postgraduate papers on formative assessment in Turkey from a thematic perspective. The thematic content analysis method was used in the study. The study group consisted of 38 (27 master's theses and 11 doctoral theses) approved doctoral theses. These dissertations were classified under 5 main themes (studies describing formative assessment competencies of teachers or pre-service teachers, studies planning the development of formative assessment components of teachers or pre-service teachers, studies examining the effects of formative assessment on student outcomes, studies on factors influencing formative assessment practices, other studies on formative assessment) were analyzed in terms of different variables. Analyzing these works according to the main topics, it was found that the studies describing the formative assessment competencies of teachers or prospective teachers and the studies planning to improve the formative assessment components of teachers or prospective teachers were the least in number. It was found that most of the studies on formative assessment were studies that examined the effects of formative assessment on student outcomes, and that these effects were mostly performance on cognitive characteristics and attitudes on affective characteristics. The most commonly used method in the studies was mixed methods, and the least used method was action research. While interviews and scales were mostly used as data collection instruments in the studies, content analysis, descriptive analysis, and t-test were frequently preferred among the data analysis methods. Suggestions for future research on formative assessment were presented at the end of the study.

Keywords: Formative assessment, content analysis, postgraduate thesis studies


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Torun, B. & Pektas, M. (2023). Content Analysis of Postgraduate Theses on Formative Assessment and Education in Turkey . TAY Journal, 7(2), 407-442. doi: 10.29329/tayjournal.2023.543.04

Harvard
Torun, B. and Pektas, M. (2023). Content Analysis of Postgraduate Theses on Formative Assessment and Education in Turkey . TAY Journal, 7(2), pp. 407-442.

Chicago 16th edition
Torun, Burcu and Murat Pektas (2023). "Content Analysis of Postgraduate Theses on Formative Assessment and Education in Turkey ". TAY Journal 7 (2):407-442. doi:10.29329/tayjournal.2023.543.04.

References

    Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523

    Aydeniz, M., & Doğan, A. (2016). Exploring pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical capacity for formative assessment through analyses of student answers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1092954

    Bala, V. G. (2013). Bilimin doğasının fen konularına entegrasyonunda biçimlendirici değerlendirme uygulamalarının bilimin doğasının öğrenimine etkisi [Influence of formative assessment applications on the learning of nature of science in the integration of nature of science in science content]. (Tez No. 339099). [Master Thesis, Hacettepe University], National Thesis Center.

    Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristic of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022

    Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2002). Formative assessment and science education. Kluwer Academic.

    Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. King's College.

    Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2003). Assesment for learning-putting it into practice. Open University.

    Boz, N., & Boz, Y. (2005). Investigating formative assessment. Education and Science, 30(138), 63-69. http://213.14.10.181/index.php/EB/article/view/4995/1092

    Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.

    Buck, G. A., & Trauth-Nare, A. E. (2009). Preparing teachers to make the formative assessment process integral to science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 475-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9142-y

    Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernable to pre‐service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 402-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20344

    Buldur, S. (2014). Performansa dayalı tekniklerle yürütülen biçimlendirmeye yönelik değerlendirme sürecinin öğretmen ve öğrenci üzerindeki etkisi [The effects of formative assessment process which in used performance-based techniques on teacher and student]. (Tez No. 354654). [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University], National Thesis Center.

    Carless, D. (2012). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. Routledge.

    Cheng, H. M. (2006). Junior secondary science teachers' understanding and practice of alternative assessment in Hong Kong: Implications for teacher professional development. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(3), 227-243.

    Cornelius, K. E. (2013). Formative assessment made easy: Templates for collecting daily data in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Expectional Children, 47(2), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500502

    Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri. [Parameters of content analysis]. Education and Science, 39(174), 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3412

    Çalık, M., Ayas, A., & Ebenezer, J. V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29-50.

    Demirel, Ö. (2004). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme – öğretme sanatı [Planning and evaluation in teaching – the art of teaching]. Pegem Akademi.

    DeNome, E. (2015). The impact on student achievement following professional development on the principles of formative assessment [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, William Howard Taft University].

    European Union Commission. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Brussels.

    Falk, A. (2012). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20473

    Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art- so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253462

    Fluckiger, J., Tixier, Y. T., Pasco, R., & Danielson, K. (2010). Formative feedback: Involving students as partners in assessment to enhance learning. College Teaching, 58(4), 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.484031

    Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2011). The formative assessment action plan: Practical steps to more successful teaching and learning. ASCD.

    Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers' enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181-1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21054

    Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de León, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 44(3), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9371-3

    Gipps, C. (1994). Developments in educational assessment: what makes a good test? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1(3), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594940010304

    Gotwals, A. W., & Birmingham, D. (2016). Eliciting, identifying, interpreting, and responding to students’ ideas: Teacher candidates’ growth in formative assessment practices. Research in Science Education, 46(3), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9461-2

    Gotwals, A. W., Philhower, J., Cisterna, D., & Bennett, S. (2015). Using video to examine formative assessment practices as measures of expertise for mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9623-8

    Harrison, C. (2013). Collaborative action research as a tool for generating formative feedback on teachers’ classroom assessment practice: The KREST project. Teachers and Teaching, 19(2), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.741839

    Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

    Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

    Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). Formative assessment and teachers' sensitivity to student responses. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 629-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1003262

    Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progression: Supporting instruction and formative assesment. Council of Chief State School Officers.

    İnaltun, H. (2019). Fen bilgisi öğretmenleri için geliştirilen biçimlendirici değerlendirmeye yönelik hizmet içi eğitim modülünün etkinliğinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effectiveness of in-service training module for developing science teachers' formative assessment practices.]. (Tez No. 568665). [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University], National Thesis Center.

    İnaltun, H., & Ateş, S. (2018). Formative assessment in science education: A literature review. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 38(2), 567-612. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.353975

    Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research papers in education, 21(02), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615638

    Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment ve grading that work. ASCD.

    McMillan, J. H. (2017). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice that enhance student learning and motivation (7 th Ed.). Pearson.

    Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018a). Science curriculum (Primary and secondary school 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 and 8th. grades). MEB.

    Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018b). English curriculum (Primary and secondary school 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades). MEB.

    Metin, M., & Birişçi, S. (2009). Effects of formative assessment on pre-service teachers’ developing science process skills and their opinions about assessment. Contemporary Education Journal, 34(370), 31-39.

    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.

    Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Advancing formative assesment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. ASCD.

    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. OECD. Access of date: 21.09.2022. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/formative-assessment_9789264007413-en#page1

    Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific ınquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20163

    Sabel, J. L., Forbes, C. T., & Zangori, L. (2015). Promoting prospective elementary teachers’ learning to use formative assessment for life science instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 419-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9431-6

    Sach, E. (2012). Teachers and testing: An investigation into teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment. Educational Studies, 38(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2011.598684

    Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004

    The Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Limited [AITSL]. (2011). Australian professional standards for teachers. Access of date: 07.10.2022. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/standards

    Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095780

    Ültay, N., & Çalık, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 686-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9357-5

    Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.) Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053-1098). Information Age.

    Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208994

    Yang, X., Teng, Y., Gu, Z., & Zhang, D. (2021). Self and peer assessment in K-12 Chinese language classrooms: Teachers’ perceptions and implantation. Research in Language and Education: An International Journal [RILE], 1(1), 69-84.

    Yavuz, M., Özkaral, T., & Yıldız, D. (2015). The teacher competencies and teacher education in international reports. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 2(2), 60-71.