Original article | TAY Journal 2023, Vol. 7(3) 75-106
Opinions of Social Studies Teachers and 7th-Grade Students Regarding Digital Literacy Skills
Esra Mindivanli-Akdoğan, Ümmühan Öner
pp. 75 - 106 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.609.04 | Manu. Number: tay journal.2023.033
Published online: October 29, 2023 | Number of Views: 31 | Number of Download: 416
Abstract
In today's rapidly evolving technological setting, having digital literacy skills is considered as a requirement to adapt to these developments. It is of great importance that secondary school students, often referred to as digital natives, acquire these skills. Similarly, the educators responsible for instructing them should have a sufficient level of knowledge. In this sense, this study aimed to examine the current state of digital literacy among social studies teachers and 7th-grade secondary school students with the goal of instructing digital literacy skills. In this study, in which the phenomenological method was employed, data was collected using two different interview forms, and was analyzed using content analysis. Both teacher and student participants generally described digital literacy as the ability to access, share, and create information in the digital environment. Since the study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the participants reported that they used the Educational Informatics Network (Eğitim Bilişim Ağı) platform and social media for educational purposes. They also expressed a shared belief in practices such as using propoer passwords, antivirus software usage, and not sharing personal or others' information to ensure security in digital environments. In addition, it was found that both teacher and student participants were aware of at least one ethical rule regarding digital literacy. Teacher participants emphasized the need for an expanded curriculum that supports digital literacy in social studies through practical education. They also mentioned that the training they received in digital literacy was insufficient and ineffective.
Keywords: Digital literacy, social studies, teacher, student
| How to Cite this Article? |
|---|
|
APA 6th edition Harvard Chicago 16th edition |
| References |
|---|
|
Arabacı, İ. B., & Polat, M. (2013). Digital natives, digital immigrants and classroom management. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12(47), 11-20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6161/82824 Bandura, R., & Leal, E. M. (2022). The digital literacy imperative. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep42041 Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EUM0000000007083/full/html Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 30(2008), 17-32. Boechler, P., Dragon, K., & Wasniewski, E. (2014). Digital literacy concepts and definitions: Implications for educational assessment and practice. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 5(4), 1-18. 10.4018/978-1-4666-8200-9.ch011 Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods.]. Pegem Akademi. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1. The digital competence framework for citizens. With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://apo.org.au/node/221736 Chapman, B. (1999). Digital Literacy: By Paul Gilster. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997. Government Information Quarterly, 16(1), 77-78. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2021). Nitel yöntemler [Qualitative methods]. (G. Kayır, Trans.). In E. Karadağ (Trans ed.), Araştırma tasarımı - nitel, nicel, karma yöntem yaklaşımları [Research design - qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods approaches] (pp.179-211). Nobel. (Original work published 2018). Chase, Z., & Laufenberg, D. (2011). Embracing the squishiness of digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(7), 535-537.https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.7.7 Çakmak, Z., & Taşkıran, C. (2017). Views of social studies teachers on education information network (EBA) platform. Inernational Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 2017(9), 284-295. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/goputeb/issue/34356/380783 Donaldson, C., & Alker, Z. (2019). Digital literacy. Journal of Victorian Culture, 24(3), 329-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/jvcult/vcz026 Dündar, R., & Yeşilyurt, S. (2020). Assessment of social studies teachers' perspectives on distance education specific to education information network. International Journal of Social Science Research, 9(1), 79-95. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijssresearch/issue/54863/745774 Eshet-Alkali, Y., & Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2004). Experiments in digital literacy. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(4), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421 Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Chajut, E. (2009). Changes over time in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 713-715. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0264 Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub. Görmez, E., & Şen, A. (2021). The views of the secondary school students on digital literacy skills. International Journal of Language Academy, 9(39), 90-101. Hall, R., Atkins, L., & Fraser, J. (2014). Defining a self-evaluation digital literacy framework for secondary educators: The digilit deicester project. Research in Learning Technology, (22), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21440 Himmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., & Bayrak, C. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school manager aspects of the revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770896 Hooft, M. (2006). Tapping into digital literacy: Handheld computers in the K-12 classroom. In Handbook of research on literacy in technology at the K-12 leve (pp. 287-307). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-59140-494-1.ch016 JISC. (2012). Developing digital literacies: briefing paper. Developing Digital Literacies: Jisc wEBArchive.org.uk JISC. (2019). Teacher profile (higher education): Six elements of digital capabilities. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7278/1/BDCP-DC-Framework-Individual-6E-110319.pdf Kennedy, D. M. (2008). Digital literacy research. In Encyclopedia of information technology curriculum integration. (pp. 228-234). IGI Global. Kuru, E. (2019). The views of social studies teacher candidates on the concept of digital literacy. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(3). 10.29228/TurkishStudies.22563 Laanpere, M. (2019). Recommendations on assessment tools for monitoring digital literacy within unesco’s digital literacy global framework. No.56. UNESCO-UIS Lanham, R. A. (1995). Digital literacy. Scientific american, 273(3), 198-199. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/24981795 Lee, S. H. (2014). Digital literacy education for the development of digital literacy. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), 5(3), 29-43. 10.4018/ijdldc.2014070103 Martin, A. (2006). A European framework for digital literacy. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2006-02-06 Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programı [Social studies curriculum] MoNE. National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education in Turkey. (2022). National qualifications framework for higher education in turkey (Nqf-hetr) 6. level (Associate's) qualifications. http://tyyc.yok.gov.tr/?pid=33 Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education 59(3). 1065-1078.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 Obel-Omia, C. H. (2017). Developing digital literacy: preparing next-generation elementary education literacy Teachers. In M. Grassetti, & S. Brookby (Eds.) Advancing next-generation teacher education through digital tools and applications (pp. 103-118). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-5225-3417-4.ch036 Owen, S, Hagel, P, Lingham, B., & Tyson, D. (2016) Digital literacy, discourse: Deakin University Library research and practice, No. 3, Geelong, Deakin University Library. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30082926 Öner, G. (2017). An alternative source for social studies and history lessons: eba.gov.tr. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2017(9), 227-257. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/goputeb/issue/34356/380609 Özaydın, A., & Kumral, O. (2021). Digital literacy through digital natives’ eyes. JRES, 8(2), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.51725/etad.1008850. Pala, Ş. M., & Başıbüyük, A. (2020). The investigation of digital literacy of fifth grade secondary school students. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 9(3), 897-921. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.672882 Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., Sharma, B., & Chand, R. (2022). Talismans of digital literacy: a statistical overview. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(5), 570-587. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.5.2599 Rotter, M. (2014). Perpetual digital literacy. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v1i1.10 Sart, G. (2017). Nitel araştırma, yöntem, teknik ve yaklaşımları [Qualitative research, methods, techniques and methods] In F. N. Seggie & Y. Bayyurt. (Ed.), Fenomoloji ve yorumlayıcı fenomolojik analiz [Phenomenology and interpretative phenomenological analysis]. (pp. 69-81). Anı. Silik, Y., & Aydın, F. (2021). Digital literacy and technological literacy: A comparative examination. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 19(4), 17-34. Taşçı Ağaoğlu, S., & Durmaz, A. (2021). Examination of secondary students' social media use and digital literacy in terms of different variables. Cappadocia Journal of Education, 2(2), 26-31. Tekerek, M., & Tekerek, A. (2013). A research on students’ information security awareness. Turkish Journal of Education, 2(3), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.181065 Tekindal, S. (2021). Nicel, nitel, karma yöntem araştırma desenleri ve istatistik [Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research designs and statistics]. Nobel Akademik. Tinmaz, H., Lee, Y. T., Fanea-Ivanovici, M., & Baber, H. (2022). A systematic review on digital literacy. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y Turkish Statistical Institute [TUIK]. (2022, 26 August). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri (BT) kullanım araştırması 2022, 45587 [Household information technologies (IT) usage survey, 2022, 45587]. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Hanehalki-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-(BT)-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2022-45587 We Are Social. (2021). A decade in digital https://datareportal.com/reports/a-decade-in-digital?utm_source=Global_Digital_Reports&utm_medium=Partner_Article&utm_campaign=Digital_2022 Yerli, M. S. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde eğitim bilişim ağı (EBA) uygulamasının öğrencilerin akademik başarısına etkisi [The effect of education informatics network (EBA) application on students academic success in teaching social studies]. (Tez No. 508960). [Master Thesis, Adıyaman University]. National Thesis Center. Yeşiltaş, E., & Gez, A. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programının dijital okuryazarlık boyutu [Digital literacy dimension of social studies curriculum]. In O, Zahal., Ş, Koca., & K, Baş (Ed.). Eğitim bilimlerinde teori ve araştırmalar II [Theory and research in educational sciences II]. (pp. 137- 158). Gece Kitaplığı. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin. |
